The pluralist system allows for multiple interest groups to compete
for influence in several policy domains, meaning that there can be a great
number of groups. While this may seem like the best approach, especially in a
democratic society, there can only be so many influential interest groups
before things start to get hectic. The government will eventually become biased
towards the most beneficial and influential interest groups, leaving the ones
with less money and other constraints to fall behind. Because of this,
neo-corporatism is a more efficient relationship between interest groups and
the government because it allows for more of a focus on certain groups who are
expressing interests to develop certain policies. A side of neo-corporatism is
an income policy, which would help control inflation, which is very important
for a well-functioning country. Pluralism allows for too many groups all
fighting over certain policies while neo-corporatism would allow peak groups to
use most of their energy actually accomplishing something.
No comments:
Post a Comment